Wechat

Website

Chinese Journal of Oncology Prevention and Treatment ›› 2013, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (3): 246-249.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5671.2013.03.13

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparing the therapeutic efficacy of TACE combined with psychro-circulation percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy or radioactive 125I particle implantation to treat large primary liver cancer

  

  • Online:2013-09-25 Published:2013-10-10

Abstract: Objective To compare the therapeutic efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with either psychro-circulation percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy or radioactive 125I particle implantation for treating large primary liver cancer (LPLC). Methods A total of 46 patients with LPLC underwent TACE and psychro-circulation percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy using the ECO-100 system, while 20 patients underwent TACE and radioactive 125I particle implantation.At 2 and 3 months after treatment, patients were analyzed by dynamic enhanced computed tomography scanning,and adverse reactions and complications were recorded. Results At 3 months after treatment,TACE combined with psychro-circulation percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy gave a local control rate of 82.61%,compared to 55.00% for TACE combined with radioactive 125I particle implantation (P<0.05). The two methods gave similar clinical control rates of 93.47% and 85.00%,respectively (P>0.05).In addition,the two groups did not differ significantly in adverse reactions,and neither group showed serious complications. Conclusion TACE combined with either psychro-circulation percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy or radioactive 125I particle implantation is effective for treating LPLC,and both methods cause similar adverse reactions.Of the two combination therapies,TACE combined with psychro-circulation percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy is more effective for treating LPLC.

Key words:  Liver neoplasms, Chemoembolization, Percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy, Radioactive 125I particle implantation, Efficacy